Template:ArticleAssessment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; background-color: #f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1;" |+ style="background-color: #eaecf0; font-weight: bold; padding: 10px; font-size: 1.2em;" | WikiMalolos Article Assessment (Human Review) |- ! scope="col" style="width: 20%;" | Dimension ! scope="col" style="width: 60%;" | Guidelines ! scope="col" style="width: 10%;" | Score (0-3) ! scope="col" style="width: 10%;" | Notes |- | '''1. Verifiability & Sourcing''' | All claims hav...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:07, 3 May 2026
| Dimension | Guidelines | Score (0-3) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Verifiability & Sourcing | All claims have valid, non-hallucinated `<ref>` tags. Sources are real local/historical texts. | 0 / 3 | |
| 2. Local Specificity | Contains hard facts, dates, names, and exact Malolos locations. No generic AI filler. | 0 / 3 | |
| 3. Tone & NPOV | Objective, academic tone. Free of flowery "AI words" (e.g., testament, rich tapestry). | 0 / 3 | |
| 4. Formatting | Correct Wikilinks, headings, categories, and reference lists are present. | 0 / 3 | |
| 5. Readability | Logical flow, excellent grammar, no repetitive robotic phrasing. | 0 / 3 | |
| TOTAL SCORE: | 0 / 15 | ||
| Reviewer Verdict: Needs Review -- Reviewed by: User1 (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2026 (UTC) | |||