| Dimension
|
Guidelines
|
Score (0-3)
|
Notes
|
| 1. Verifiability & Sourcing
|
All claims have valid, non-hallucinated `<ref>` tags. Sources are real local/historical texts.
|
0 / 3
|
|
| 2. Local Specificity
|
Contains hard facts, dates, names, and exact Malolos locations. No generic AI filler.
|
0 / 3
|
|
| 3. Tone & NPOV
|
Objective, academic tone. Free of flowery "AI words" (e.g., testament, rich tapestry).
|
0 / 3
|
|
| 4. Formatting
|
Correct Wikilinks, headings, categories, and reference lists are present.
|
0 / 3
|
|
| 5. Readability
|
Logical flow, excellent grammar, no repetitive robotic phrasing.
|
0 / 3
|
|
| TOTAL SCORE:
|
0 / 15
|
| Reviewer Verdict: Needs Review -- Reviewed by: User1 (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
|